While much has been written about the Clintons’ Iran/Contra
involvement with the Bush Crime Family via an obscure CIA airfield in Mena,
Arkansas, running guns for drugs to the Nicaraguan Contras when Bill Clinton
was Governor of Arkansas, and their involvement in other deep state events,
such as the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, the massacre of Branch Davidians
in Waco, Texas, and the bombing of the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma
City, Oklahoma, no one has asked what ought to be the most obvious question -
did the Clintons have foreknowledge of 9/11?
Considering Hillary Clinton’s role as Secretary of State,
arming al Qaeda rebels in Syria via a CIA annex in Benghazi, Libya, where
Ambassador Stevens and three others were killed, as well as, her participation
in the ruse surrounding the faked raid on Abbottabad, Pakistan in which “Osama
bin Laden” is said to have been killed, one has to wonder were the Clintons
involved in the planning of 9/11?
A huge red flag went up earlier this year, when Robert
Kagan, a co-founder along with William Kristol of the neocon think tank Project
for a New American Century (PNAC) endorsed Hillary Clinton. Kagan, a
former Republican, is the husband of Victoria Nuland, Assistant Secretary of
State in the Obama Administration.
Nuland was a key player behind the Maidan coup that
overthrew the democratically elected government of Victor Yanukovych in
Ukraine, and set in motion the ongoing civil war in Ukraine between the
pro-NATO Kiev government and pro-Russian separatists in two breakaway
provinces. Before joining the Obama Administration, Victoria Nuland
served as Deputy Secretary of State in the Clinton Administration.
In 2,000, PNAC, the organization her husband co-founded,
wrote a paper entitled “Rebuilding America’s Defenses,” which called for a “new
Pearl Harbor” to serve as a catalyst for revolutionizing military affairs.
The following year “al-Qaeda,” on cue, obliged. PNAC members, along with
Kagan and Kristol, included: Dick Cheney, Jeb Bush, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard
Pearle, and Donald Rumsfeld among others.
We know 9/11 was an inside job, because even before the
first plane struck the north tower of the World Trade Center, the invasion
plans for Afghanistan were already sitting on President Bush’s desk awaiting
his return from Sarasota, Florida, where he was preoccupied reading The
Pet Goat to
grade school children when he was notified of the attacks. This was
revealed in 2002, by veteran NBC news correspondent James Miklaszewski, though
the obvious significance of this story has remained studiously downplayed by
the corporate media to this day.
According to the L.A. Times, one day before the September
11th 2001 attacks, Bill Clinton told a business gathering in Australia
that he could have killed Osama bin Laden in 1998, but chose not to because he
feared it might endanger civilians living in the area around Kandahar.
Of course he didn’t have any qualms about endangering the
lives of innocent civilians when it came to bombing an aspirin factory in
Khartoum, Sudan to divert attention away from his impeachment proceedings.
Perhaps the real reason President Clinton didn’t kill Osama
bin Laden is because the “Emanuel Goldstein of terrorism” was a CIA asset,
whose usefulness to the agency would live long after his actual death in late
2001, in the form of faked videos trotted out at strategic times, such as right
before Presidential elections in order to frighten the public.
Even if we are to take Bubba at his word regarding bin
Laden, what should raise a few eyebrows along with red flags was the shutting
down of the U.S. military’s Able Danger data mining program, which had been
tracking the movements of four of the most prominent members of the soon-to-be
9/11 hijackers: Mohamed Atta, Marwan al Shehhi, Khalid al Mihdhar, and Nawaf al
Hazmi.
Able Danger had determined that all four suspected
terrorists were connected to the al Farouq Mosque in Brooklyn, New York, run by
the blind sheikh Omar Abdul Rahman, which had been at the center of the first
World Trade Center bombing.
For some inexplicable reason, which has never been
adequately explained, during the period May – June 2,000, the Able Danger team
was ordered to destroy 2.5 Terabytes of data pertaining to the suspected
terrorists, along with additional data pertaining to transfers of weapons
technology to the China, at the heart of the Clinton’s Chinagate scandal.
Was President Clinton responsible for ordering the
destruction of this information? If so, what was his justification?
This is particularly relevant today, in light of the
current Clinton email scandal, in which the Clintons are suspected of using
multiple unsecured servers, which didn’t even have basic password protection,
for the retention and transmission of classified secrets. Was this a pay to
play operations run in conjunction with the Clinton Foundation?
The behavior of Clinton Administration’s National Security
Advisor Sandy Berger, who was caught red handed and later pleaded guilty and
fined for stealing and destroying documents from the National Archive prior to
his testifying before the 9/11 Commission, raises even more troubling
questions. What was he hiding?
Thanks to the diligent research of Professor Peter Dale
Scott, we know that beginning in the Reagan Administration, both Dick Cheney
and Donald Rumsfeld participated in Continuity of Government exercises that
continued through the Clinton Administration and into the Bush Administration whereupon
they were implemented on 9/11.
One of the selling points used by members of the 9/11
Commission in peddling their cover-up to the public has been its
bipartisanship. If the Clintons were involved in 9/11, that would explain
why both political parties have circled their wagons around the official
version of what happened.
Considering the Clinton Foundation has received upwards of
$25 million along with an additional $10 million for the Clinton Library from
the government of Saudi Arabia we need to be asking in whose interests are the
Clintons serving?
